https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213404 Allegations that the accused falsely represented hire-purchase machinery as free from encumbrance, issued a no lien certificate, and induced payment despite an existing prior charge were held to disclose criminal deception and fabrication. The Court noted that fraudulent or dishonest intention at the inception is an essential ingredient of cheating, and whether such intention existed, or whether the complainant had notice of the earlier charge, are matters for trial. The plea that the dispute was purely civil did not justify rejection at the threshold. Proceedings were therefore not quashed, and interference under inherent jurisdiction was declined. en-us Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 20 May 2012 11:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213404 Allegations that the accused falsely represented hire-purchase machinery as free from encumbrance, issued a no lien certificate, and induced payment despite an existing prior charge were held to disclose criminal deception and fabrication. The Court noted that fraudulent or dishonest intention at the inception is an essential ingredient of cheating, and whether such intention existed, or whether the complainant had notice of the earlier charge, are matters for trial. The plea that the dispute was purely civil did not justify rejection at the threshold. Proceedings were therefore not quashed, and interference under inherent jurisdiction was declined. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213404