https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213391 The court allowed the petition for restoration of the respondent company's name on the register. It found that the petitioner, having a right to recover damages due to fraudulent acts by the company and its directors, was entitled to the restoration. The court dismissed objections regarding jurisdiction and locus standi, affirming the petitioner's right to claim losses. Issues related to defective cause title and share capital were addressed, with the court deeming the petition legal and valid. The company's name was ordered to be restored with immediate effect. en-us Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213391 The court allowed the petition for restoration of the respondent company's name on the register. It found that the petitioner, having a right to recover damages due to fraudulent acts by the company and its directors, was entitled to the restoration. The court dismissed objections regarding jurisdiction and locus standi, affirming the petitioner's right to claim losses. Issues related to defective cause title and share capital were addressed, with the court deeming the petition legal and valid. The company's name was ordered to be restored with immediate effect. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213391