https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213374 A prima facie order under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act need only disclose limited reasons, unlike a fully determinative adjudicatory order, and the reasons recorded here were held sufficient. Forwarding the investigation report to the parties and fixing a hearing for objections under Regulations 21(7) and 21(8) was consistent with the regulatory scheme, as the stage for any further inquiry had not been reached. No further direction on document supply was required, but time was granted to file objections after receipt of documents, with the hearing to be rescheduled accordingly. en-us Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213374 A prima facie order under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act need only disclose limited reasons, unlike a fully determinative adjudicatory order, and the reasons recorded here were held sufficient. Forwarding the investigation report to the parties and fixing a hearing for objections under Regulations 21(7) and 21(8) was consistent with the regulatory scheme, as the stage for any further inquiry had not been reached. No further direction on document supply was required, but time was granted to file objections after receipt of documents, with the hearing to be rescheduled accordingly. Case-Laws Law of Competition Tue, 04 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213374