https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213368 The Court rejected the respondent's jurisdictional arguments and admitted the winding-up petition, appointing the Official Liquidator to take control of the company's assets. The termination of the Exclusive Collaboration Agreement was deemed valid, with the respondent's actions indicating acceptance. Allegations of defective goods and breach of contract were dismissed due to lack of evidence. The respondent's acknowledgments of debt were upheld, and the Court found no genuine dispute. The winding-up proceedings were allowed to proceed, with the respondent's defenses deemed unconvincing. en-us Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Feb 2013 13:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213368 The Court rejected the respondent's jurisdictional arguments and admitted the winding-up petition, appointing the Official Liquidator to take control of the company's assets. The termination of the Exclusive Collaboration Agreement was deemed valid, with the respondent's actions indicating acceptance. Allegations of defective goods and breach of contract were dismissed due to lack of evidence. The respondent's acknowledgments of debt were upheld, and the Court found no genuine dispute. The winding-up proceedings were allowed to proceed, with the respondent's defenses deemed unconvincing. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213368