<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 669 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213363</link>
    <description>The Company Law Board, Chennai Bench, declined to grant an interim order sought by the appellant to restrain removal as a Director in an Extraordinary General Meeting under the Companies Act. The Board found no exceptional grounds to interfere with its discretion and noted that the EGM&#039;s decision would be subject to the Company Petition&#039;s outcome. The Court directed the Board to expedite the main petition&#039;s decision, granting the appellant one week to file a rejoinder and instructing the Board to dispose of the main petition within two months. The appeal was disposed of, and a miscellaneous civil application was dismissed as unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 669 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213363</link>
      <description>The Company Law Board, Chennai Bench, declined to grant an interim order sought by the appellant to restrain removal as a Director in an Extraordinary General Meeting under the Companies Act. The Board found no exceptional grounds to interfere with its discretion and noted that the EGM&#039;s decision would be subject to the Company Petition&#039;s outcome. The Court directed the Board to expedite the main petition&#039;s decision, granting the appellant one week to file a rejoinder and instructing the Board to dispose of the main petition within two months. The appeal was disposed of, and a miscellaneous civil application was dismissed as unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>