<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 1 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213359</link>
    <description>A prosecution for false corporate disclosure could not be sustained where the balance-sheet was duly filed and signed as required, and the only defect was an erroneous entry in the accompanying Form 23AC. In the absence of any allegation that the balance-sheet itself contained a false, misleading, or concealed material statement, a mere clerical or typographical mistake in the forwarding form did not satisfy the ingredients of section 628 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court stated that the proper course was correction of the form, not prosecution, and the proceedings were therefore liable to be quashed under section 633(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 1 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213359</link>
      <description>A prosecution for false corporate disclosure could not be sustained where the balance-sheet was duly filed and signed as required, and the only defect was an erroneous entry in the accompanying Form 23AC. In the absence of any allegation that the balance-sheet itself contained a false, misleading, or concealed material statement, a mere clerical or typographical mistake in the forwarding form did not satisfy the ingredients of section 628 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court stated that the proper course was correction of the form, not prosecution, and the proceedings were therefore liable to be quashed under section 633(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>