<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 261 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213352</link>
    <description>Professional-service income received by a China-based entity for architectural work is governed by the India-China tax treaty where the recipient has no permanent establishment or fixed base in India. Services rendered from China in those circumstances are not taxable in India, so no tax deduction at source obligation arises. Interest disallowance relating to alleged interest-free advances to sister concerns requires examination of the advances&#039; true nature, the source of funds, and whether the advances served commercial expediency. A final interest deduction position cannot rest solely on assumptions about available non-interest-bearing funds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 06:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 261 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213352</link>
      <description>Professional-service income received by a China-based entity for architectural work is governed by the India-China tax treaty where the recipient has no permanent establishment or fixed base in India. Services rendered from China in those circumstances are not taxable in India, so no tax deduction at source obligation arises. Interest disallowance relating to alleged interest-free advances to sister concerns requires examination of the advances&#039; true nature, the source of funds, and whether the advances served commercial expediency. A final interest deduction position cannot rest solely on assumptions about available non-interest-bearing funds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>