<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 258 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213349</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remitted the case for fresh consideration after finding the rejection of the adjournment application and the ex-parte decision as unjust. The Court imposed a cost on the appellant, directing compliance within four weeks to avoid further consequences. The decision emphasized the importance of fair hearings in tax appeals and proper consideration of adjournment requests, establishing a precedent for similar cases in the future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 07:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 258 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213349</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and remitted the case for fresh consideration after finding the rejection of the adjournment application and the ex-parte decision as unjust. The Court imposed a cost on the appellant, directing compliance within four weeks to avoid further consequences. The decision emphasized the importance of fair hearings in tax appeals and proper consideration of adjournment requests, establishing a precedent for similar cases in the future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>