<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 257 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213348</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenges and ruling in favor of the assessee. The court affirmed that there was no remission of liability for outstanding brokerage payable, allowed indexation benefit on redemption of preference shares, considered the redemption of non-cumulative preference shares as a &#039;transfer&#039; under the Income Tax Act, and granted indexation benefit on such redemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 16:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 257 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213348</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s challenges and ruling in favor of the assessee. The court affirmed that there was no remission of liability for outstanding brokerage payable, allowed indexation benefit on redemption of preference shares, considered the redemption of non-cumulative preference shares as a &#039;transfer&#039; under the Income Tax Act, and granted indexation benefit on such redemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>