<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 234 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, with certain grounds being remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, while others were decided based on established legal principles. The Tribunal balanced the decision by granting the assessee a chance to substantiate their claims while respecting legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 234 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, with certain grounds being remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, while others were decided based on established legal principles. The Tribunal balanced the decision by granting the assessee a chance to substantiate their claims while respecting legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>