<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 224 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213315</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, set aside the duty demand, education cess, and penalty imposed on an appellant for availing Cenvat credit on inputs used for both dutiable and exempted goods. The Tribunal held that the appellant had paid the required amount for exempted goods, making Section 11D inapplicable. The demands and penalties were deemed to lack legal basis, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 224 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213315</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, set aside the duty demand, education cess, and penalty imposed on an appellant for availing Cenvat credit on inputs used for both dutiable and exempted goods. The Tribunal held that the appellant had paid the required amount for exempted goods, making Section 11D inapplicable. The demands and penalties were deemed to lack legal basis, leading to the appeal being allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>