https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213283 At the stay stage, co-loader activity was treated as prima facie taxable under Business Auxiliary Service after the 10.9.2004 amendment, and suppression of relevant facts justified invocation of the extended period. The Tribunal also noted the contention that service tax had already been paid under Business Support Service for part of the period. Balancing these factors, it ordered a substantial pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the balance demand pending disposal of the appeal. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213283 At the stay stage, co-loader activity was treated as prima facie taxable under Business Auxiliary Service after the 10.9.2004 amendment, and suppression of relevant facts justified invocation of the extended period. The Tribunal also noted the contention that service tax had already been paid under Business Support Service for part of the period. Balancing these factors, it ordered a substantial pre-deposit and stayed recovery of the balance demand pending disposal of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213283