<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 787 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213266</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the deletion of additions made by the CIT (A) concerning unexplained deposits and unexplained investment in an advance. The Court found the explanations provided by the assessee satisfactory, emphasizing that the authorities&#039; findings were based on a proper appreciation of the evidence on record. The Tribunal&#039;s analysis was deemed correct, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 787 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213266</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions in dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the deletion of additions made by the CIT (A) concerning unexplained deposits and unexplained investment in an advance. The Court found the explanations provided by the assessee satisfactory, emphasizing that the authorities&#039; findings were based on a proper appreciation of the evidence on record. The Tribunal&#039;s analysis was deemed correct, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>