https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213245 Rule 10(4) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 applies only where a dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement has been set aside or rendered void by a court decision and the disciplinary authority then decides to hold a further inquiry. The setting aside of the criminal conviction did not automatically nullify the earlier dismissal; a formal order was required to give effect to the acquittal and then determine further departmental action. The suspension direction could not validly operate retrospectively from 8.4.2005, and was treated as effective only from 7.10.2008 under Rule 10(1), pending enquiry. The employee was therefore entitled to full pay and allowances for the intervening period. en-us Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 May 2012 07:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213245 Rule 10(4) of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 applies only where a dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement has been set aside or rendered void by a court decision and the disciplinary authority then decides to hold a further inquiry. The setting aside of the criminal conviction did not automatically nullify the earlier dismissal; a formal order was required to give effect to the acquittal and then determine further departmental action. The suspension direction could not validly operate retrospectively from 8.4.2005, and was treated as effective only from 7.10.2008 under Rule 10(1), pending enquiry. The employee was therefore entitled to full pay and allowances for the intervening period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213245