<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 176 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213231</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the amendments to Section 43-B proviso by the Finance Act 2003 should be applied retrospectively from 1st April 1988. Consequently, the department&#039;s appeal, disputing the retrospective nature of the amendments and seeking disallowance of late payments of PF, ESIC, and ESI contributions, was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 176 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213231</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the amendments to Section 43-B proviso by the Finance Act 2003 should be applied retrospectively from 1st April 1988. Consequently, the department&#039;s appeal, disputing the retrospective nature of the amendments and seeking disallowance of late payments of PF, ESIC, and ESI contributions, was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>