<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 174 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213227</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement and Demerger between Zuari Industries Limited and Zuari Holdings Limited under Sections 391, 394, and 395 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not prejudicial to shareholders, creditors, or the public. Despite objections raised regarding the swapping of company names and concerns about the promoter group&#039;s increased control, the court approved the scheme, emphasizing the majority shareholders&#039; approval and the absence of demonstrated prejudice. The court refused to stay the order, affirming shareholder support for the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 174 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213227</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement and Demerger between Zuari Industries Limited and Zuari Holdings Limited under Sections 391, 394, and 395 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court found the scheme fair, reasonable, and not prejudicial to shareholders, creditors, or the public. Despite objections raised regarding the swapping of company names and concerns about the promoter group&#039;s increased control, the court approved the scheme, emphasizing the majority shareholders&#039; approval and the absence of demonstrated prejudice. The court refused to stay the order, affirming shareholder support for the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>