<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 166 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213213</link>
    <description>The court found that the petitioner was given a reasonable opportunity of hearing as required under the proviso to Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the court determined that the accounts were complex, justifying the special audit. As a result, the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 08:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 166 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213213</link>
      <description>The court found that the petitioner was given a reasonable opportunity of hearing as required under the proviso to Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act. Additionally, the court determined that the accounts were complex, justifying the special audit. As a result, the writ petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>