<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 164 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213211</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on condoning the delay in filing the appeal, deleting the quantum addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, and deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal stressed the significance of affording a fair opportunity to the assessee and emphasized the need for the Assessing Officer to conduct comprehensive investigations when challenging the authenticity of transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 09:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 164 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213211</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals filed by the Revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on condoning the delay in filing the appeal, deleting the quantum addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, and deleting the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal stressed the significance of affording a fair opportunity to the assessee and emphasized the need for the Assessing Officer to conduct comprehensive investigations when challenging the authenticity of transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>