<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 157 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213204</link>
    <description>Issue estoppel applies only to the factual issue actually finally determined in earlier proceedings, so an order concerning co-noticees did not exonerate the appellant. In FEMA adjudication, liability can be proved on a preponderance of probabilities through surrounding circumstances, fictitious shipping bills, substituted goods, bogus purchase bills and reliable statements, including retracted statements if found voluntary and true. The material showed unauthorized inward remittances and transactions linked to bogus exports, establishing breach of the foreign exchange restrictions. The penalty was therefore sustained as commensurate with the misconduct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 08:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 157 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213204</link>
      <description>Issue estoppel applies only to the factual issue actually finally determined in earlier proceedings, so an order concerning co-noticees did not exonerate the appellant. In FEMA adjudication, liability can be proved on a preponderance of probabilities through surrounding circumstances, fictitious shipping bills, substituted goods, bogus purchase bills and reliable statements, including retracted statements if found voluntary and true. The material showed unauthorized inward remittances and transactions linked to bogus exports, establishing breach of the foreign exchange restrictions. The penalty was therefore sustained as commensurate with the misconduct.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>