https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213203 The court dismissed the writ appeal, upholding the confiscation of goods under Sections 111(d) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's failure to prove ownership and meet import conditions led to the affirmation of the lower court's decision. The court emphasized the importance of complying with import regulations and establishing ownership before seeking the release of goods. en-us Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213203 The court dismissed the writ appeal, upholding the confiscation of goods under Sections 111(d) and 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant's failure to prove ownership and meet import conditions led to the affirmation of the lower court's decision. The court emphasized the importance of complying with import regulations and establishing ownership before seeking the release of goods. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213203