<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 154 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213200</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the parties to approach the Tribunal to resolve disputed facts and decide the appeals. The interim stay granted by the High Court would continue until the Tribunal addressed the appeals. Rebate claims disbursed were treated as interim measures pending appeal outcomes. The Tribunal was instructed to independently decide the appeals without influence from the High Court&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 08:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 154 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213200</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the parties to approach the Tribunal to resolve disputed facts and decide the appeals. The interim stay granted by the High Court would continue until the Tribunal addressed the appeals. Rebate claims disbursed were treated as interim measures pending appeal outcomes. The Tribunal was instructed to independently decide the appeals without influence from the High Court&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>