https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213194 The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues set aside for fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer (AO). The Tribunal highlighted violations of natural justice principles, improper adoption of comparables, flawed transfer pricing analysis, and incorrect computation of margins. The AO was directed to ensure fair procedures, proper adjustments, inclusion of range benefits, and accurate computation of deductions, emphasizing compliance with legal standards and precedents. en-us Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213194 The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with several issues set aside for fresh adjudication by the Assessing Officer (AO). The Tribunal highlighted violations of natural justice principles, improper adoption of comparables, flawed transfer pricing analysis, and incorrect computation of margins. The AO was directed to ensure fair procedures, proper adjustments, inclusion of range benefits, and accurate computation of deductions, emphasizing compliance with legal standards and precedents. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213194