<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1000 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213188</link>
    <description>The court upheld the State Information Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling in favor of disclosing the contract under the RTI Act to promote transparency and accountability, emphasizing public interest over confidentiality concerns. The court found no legal error in the Commissioner&#039;s decision and dismissed the petitions, denying the request to maintain interim orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 08:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1000 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213188</link>
      <description>The court upheld the State Information Commissioner&#039;s order, ruling in favor of disclosing the contract under the RTI Act to promote transparency and accountability, emphasizing public interest over confidentiality concerns. The court found no legal error in the Commissioner&#039;s decision and dismissed the petitions, denying the request to maintain interim orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>