<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 149 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213185</link>
    <description>The High Court held that using the fair market value as on March 31, 1989, for reverse indexation to determine the value of disputed jewellery as on April 1, 1974, was appropriate. The court directed the Assessing Officer to recalculate capital gains based on this valuation, allowing the appeal and ruling in favor of the assessee due to the substantial error in not utilizing the correct valuation date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 08:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 149 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213185</link>
      <description>The High Court held that using the fair market value as on March 31, 1989, for reverse indexation to determine the value of disputed jewellery as on April 1, 1974, was appropriate. The court directed the Assessing Officer to recalculate capital gains based on this valuation, allowing the appeal and ruling in favor of the assessee due to the substantial error in not utilizing the correct valuation date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>