https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213149 The court discharged all respondents except the 3rd respondent in a case where the Official Liquidator alleged non-compliance with filing the statement of affairs under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956. The 3rd respondent successfully proved resignation before the winding-up order with supporting documents, leading to their discharge from the proceedings. The court accepted the resignation evidence, absolving the 3rd respondent from the filing requirement and subsequently disposing of the application due to the lack of merit after the 3rd respondent's discharge. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 May 2012 18:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213149 The court discharged all respondents except the 3rd respondent in a case where the Official Liquidator alleged non-compliance with filing the statement of affairs under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 1956. The 3rd respondent successfully proved resignation before the winding-up order with supporting documents, leading to their discharge from the proceedings. The court accepted the resignation evidence, absolving the 3rd respondent from the filing requirement and subsequently disposing of the application due to the lack of merit after the 3rd respondent's discharge. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213149