<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 638 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that transportation costs should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation, as goods were sold at the factory gate with transportation costs to be borne by the buyer. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to drop the demands was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 638 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that transportation costs should not be included in the assessable value for excise duty calculation, as goods were sold at the factory gate with transportation costs to be borne by the buyer. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision to drop the demands was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>