https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213138 The Appellate Tribunal found that the service tax demand up to March 2008 was time-barred but ruled in favor of the tax authorities for the subsequent period. The Tribunal also noted the absence of cum-tax benefit consideration for the period of April 2008 to March 2009. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit a specific sum within a set timeframe, waived the pre-deposit of the balance dues, and stayed the recovery of the remaining amount pending the outcome of the appeals. en-us Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 May 2012 08:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213138 The Appellate Tribunal found that the service tax demand up to March 2008 was time-barred but ruled in favor of the tax authorities for the subsequent period. The Tribunal also noted the absence of cum-tax benefit consideration for the period of April 2008 to March 2009. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the applicant to deposit a specific sum within a set timeframe, waived the pre-deposit of the balance dues, and stayed the recovery of the remaining amount pending the outcome of the appeals. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213138