<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 631 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213125</link>
    <description>The court held that the corrigendum dated 29-11-2002 had retrospective effect from the original notification date (19-4-2002). The orders of the appellate and revisional authorities disallowing the rebate were invalidated as they were based on the original notification, not the corrected version. The court quashed these orders and reinstated the assessing authority&#039;s decision, allowing the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 09:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 631 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213125</link>
      <description>The court held that the corrigendum dated 29-11-2002 had retrospective effect from the original notification date (19-4-2002). The orders of the appellate and revisional authorities disallowing the rebate were invalidated as they were based on the original notification, not the corrected version. The court quashed these orders and reinstated the assessing authority&#039;s decision, allowing the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>