https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213124 The court denied relief to the petitioner challenging an order confirming short levy without prior notice under Section 28. The petitioner failed to submit required documents within the specified timeframe despite multiple reminders. The court emphasized the necessity of proper communication and service of notices. The petitioner's arguments were deemed lacking in merit, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition. The petitioner was directed to pay costs of Rs.5,000 to the Kerala High Court Legal Services Committee within one month, stressing the importance of compliance with statutory obligations in import procedures. en-us Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 May 2012 09:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213124 The court denied relief to the petitioner challenging an order confirming short levy without prior notice under Section 28. The petitioner failed to submit required documents within the specified timeframe despite multiple reminders. The court emphasized the necessity of proper communication and service of notices. The petitioner's arguments were deemed lacking in merit, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition. The petitioner was directed to pay costs of Rs.5,000 to the Kerala High Court Legal Services Committee within one month, stressing the importance of compliance with statutory obligations in import procedures. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213124