<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 627 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, clarifying that goods used as paints for repair and maintenance purposes are eligible for Cenvat credit if received and used within the factory premises, in accordance with Rule 2(K) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The decision overturned the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s ruling, which upheld the denial of credit, emphasizing that the paints used for painting machinery and pipes qualified as inputs under the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 627 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, clarifying that goods used as paints for repair and maintenance purposes are eligible for Cenvat credit if received and used within the factory premises, in accordance with Rule 2(K) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The decision overturned the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s ruling, which upheld the denial of credit, emphasizing that the paints used for painting machinery and pipes qualified as inputs under the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>