<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 626 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for rectification of mistakes (ROM) as it sought to recall the order and rehear the appeal, beyond the scope of Section 129B(2). The Tribunal emphasized that all relevant submissions were considered, and the non-acceptance of certain submissions did not constitute errors. The application was dismissed, with the order pronounced on 15-6-2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 626 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application for rectification of mistakes (ROM) as it sought to recall the order and rehear the appeal, beyond the scope of Section 129B(2). The Tribunal emphasized that all relevant submissions were considered, and the non-acceptance of certain submissions did not constitute errors. The application was dismissed, with the order pronounced on 15-6-2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>