https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213114 In service tax proceedings, the Commissioner (Appeals) was recognised as having power to remand, so the objection to the remand order failed. The delay-condonation order was unsustainable because it did not record when the original order was received, when the appeal was filed, or whether the delay fell within the permissible condonable period. That aspect was set aside and remitted for fresh decision after hearing the respondents. en-us Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 May 2012 18:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213114 In service tax proceedings, the Commissioner (Appeals) was recognised as having power to remand, so the objection to the remand order failed. The delay-condonation order was unsustainable because it did not record when the original order was received, when the appeal was filed, or whether the delay fell within the permissible condonable period. That aspect was set aside and remitted for fresh decision after hearing the respondents. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213114