<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213107</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the Revenue regarding the validity of the warrant of authorization under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the name of the respondent-assessee was indeed mentioned in the warrant of authorization, contrary to the Tribunal&#039;s findings. Additionally, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on the legitimacy of additions made in the block assessment proceedings, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for a detailed re-examination due to the inadequacy of the Tribunal&#039;s findings and reasoning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 107 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213107</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the Revenue regarding the validity of the warrant of authorization under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the name of the respondent-assessee was indeed mentioned in the warrant of authorization, contrary to the Tribunal&#039;s findings. Additionally, the Court ruled in favor of the Revenue on the legitimacy of additions made in the block assessment proceedings, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for a detailed re-examination due to the inadequacy of the Tribunal&#039;s findings and reasoning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>