<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 105 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213105</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing adherence to the limitation period for filing appeals and providing proper hearing opportunities. The decision underscored the importance of factual evidence in determining timeliness and ensuring fair adjudication on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 105 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213105</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, emphasizing adherence to the limitation period for filing appeals and providing proper hearing opportunities. The decision underscored the importance of factual evidence in determining timeliness and ensuring fair adjudication on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>