<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 98 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete both additions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of correctly attributing investments and gains to the actual investor, as evidenced by ledger accounts and cash books. The decision highlighted the need for thorough assessment based on concrete evidence rather than doubts and suspicions, ensuring fair and accurate taxation practices under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 98 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete both additions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of correctly attributing investments and gains to the actual investor, as evidenced by ledger accounts and cash books. The decision highlighted the need for thorough assessment based on concrete evidence rather than doubts and suspicions, ensuring fair and accurate taxation practices under the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>