https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213070 The court upheld the dismissal of the Writ Petition by the Learned Single Judge, ruling that the appellant should pursue their claim through a regular civil suit rather than under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court found that the Respondent disputed the appellant's claims, making the Writ Petition not maintainable. The decision emphasized that the appropriate remedy for the appellant, seeking recovery with interest, was through a civil suit. Consequently, the court dismissed the Writ Appeal, advising the appellant to seek redressal in a civil court for their dispute. en-us Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 May 2012 07:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213070 The court upheld the dismissal of the Writ Petition by the Learned Single Judge, ruling that the appellant should pursue their claim through a regular civil suit rather than under Article 226 of the Constitution. The court found that the Respondent disputed the appellant's claims, making the Writ Petition not maintainable. The decision emphasized that the appropriate remedy for the appellant, seeking recovery with interest, was through a civil suit. Consequently, the court dismissed the Writ Appeal, advising the appellant to seek redressal in a civil court for their dispute. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213070