https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213068 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellants Cenvat Credit on inputs despite discrepancies in goods description on the invoices. Emphasizing the actual receipt and use of the goods, the Tribunal held that essential invoice details were present, entitling the appellants to the credit. Relying on Rule 7(1)(a) provisions and precedent, the Tribunal overturned the denial of credit, highlighting that the discrepancy did not negate the legitimate receipt and utilization of the goods by the appellants. en-us Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213068 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellants Cenvat Credit on inputs despite discrepancies in goods description on the invoices. Emphasizing the actual receipt and use of the goods, the Tribunal held that essential invoice details were present, entitling the appellants to the credit. Relying on Rule 7(1)(a) provisions and precedent, the Tribunal overturned the denial of credit, highlighting that the discrepancy did not negate the legitimate receipt and utilization of the goods by the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213068