https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213052 The Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment years in question, dismissing the Department's appeals and the assessee's cross-objections. Relying on legal precedent and evidence showing genuine share purchase, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee regarding the deletion of additions for accommodation entry and unexplained commission expenditure. The burden of proof was deemed insufficiently discharged by the Department, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee based on established legal principles and prior judicial decisions. en-us Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213052 The Tribunal confirmed the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment years in question, dismissing the Department's appeals and the assessee's cross-objections. Relying on legal precedent and evidence showing genuine share purchase, the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee regarding the deletion of additions for accommodation entry and unexplained commission expenditure. The burden of proof was deemed insufficiently discharged by the Department, leading to the decision in favor of the assessee based on established legal principles and prior judicial decisions. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 15 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213052