<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 611 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213049</link>
    <description>The Andhra Pradesh HC treated the deletion of the Actual User Condition under the Tariff Rate Quota scheme as a policy decision within executive competence under the Foreign Trade Policy and Handbook of Procedures. It noted that Para 2.8 permits an authorisation to include terms and conditions, including the Actual User Condition, showing discretion to impose or omit it. In the absence of clear illegality or constitutional infringement, the Court declined interim interference with the notification and left the Single Judge&#039;s order undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 611 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213049</link>
      <description>The Andhra Pradesh HC treated the deletion of the Actual User Condition under the Tariff Rate Quota scheme as a policy decision within executive competence under the Foreign Trade Policy and Handbook of Procedures. It noted that Para 2.8 permits an authorisation to include terms and conditions, including the Actual User Condition, showing discretion to impose or omit it. In the absence of clear illegality or constitutional infringement, the Court declined interim interference with the notification and left the Single Judge&#039;s order undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>