<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 72 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213027</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and dismissed the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection in a case involving block assessment and penalty orders for the period 1988-89 to 1997-98 under Sections 158BC and 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the addition of Rs.1.09 crores as unaccounted payments to film directors and a film producer but restored the deletion of Rs.44.62 lakhs as advances from theatre owners. Additionally, the court ruled against the deduction claim under Section 80-IA, dismissed the claim of a loan from a sister-in-law, and sustained penalties on two undisclosed income items totaling Rs.30 lakhs under Section 158BFA(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 16:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 72 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213027</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and dismissed the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection in a case involving block assessment and penalty orders for the period 1988-89 to 1997-98 under Sections 158BC and 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the addition of Rs.1.09 crores as unaccounted payments to film directors and a film producer but restored the deletion of Rs.44.62 lakhs as advances from theatre owners. Additionally, the court ruled against the deduction claim under Section 80-IA, dismissed the claim of a loan from a sister-in-law, and sustained penalties on two undisclosed income items totaling Rs.30 lakhs under Section 158BFA(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>