<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 69 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213024</link>
    <description>The court held that no case was made out for a complete waiver of the predeposit requirement. However, considering the circumstances, the court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order, directing the Appellant to deposit 60% of the penalty amount within four weeks. The court clarified that its observations were confined to the application for predeposit and would not affect the independent evaluation of the merits in the appeal. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 69 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213024</link>
      <description>The court held that no case was made out for a complete waiver of the predeposit requirement. However, considering the circumstances, the court modified the Tribunal&#039;s order, directing the Appellant to deposit 60% of the penalty amount within four weeks. The court clarified that its observations were confined to the application for predeposit and would not affect the independent evaluation of the merits in the appeal. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>