<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 402 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213021</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and stay applications, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing refunds based on the understanding of &#039;sale&#039; in the context of the exemption notification and VAT Acts. The Tribunal found that supplying Set Top Boxes on a right to use basis constituted a sale under the exemption notification, meeting the conditions for refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) as VAT had been paid on the sales. The definition of &#039;sale&#039; in the VAT Acts was crucial in determining eligibility for the refund, and the Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision in favor of the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 402 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213021</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and stay applications, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing refunds based on the understanding of &#039;sale&#039; in the context of the exemption notification and VAT Acts. The Tribunal found that supplying Set Top Boxes on a right to use basis constituted a sale under the exemption notification, meeting the conditions for refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) as VAT had been paid on the sales. The definition of &#039;sale&#039; in the VAT Acts was crucial in determining eligibility for the refund, and the Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision in favor of the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>