<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 66 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213018</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the orders of the Commissioner and CESTAT, directing the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits without requiring pre-deposit, considering the circumstances and period involved. The Court did not address the Tribunal&#039;s power to order pre-deposit under Section 35C(1). The appeal was disposed of without costs, leaving all contentions open for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 66 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213018</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the orders of the Commissioner and CESTAT, directing the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits without requiring pre-deposit, considering the circumstances and period involved. The Court did not address the Tribunal&#039;s power to order pre-deposit under Section 35C(1). The appeal was disposed of without costs, leaving all contentions open for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>