https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213013 The High Court quashed the revisional authority's decision allowing the First Respondent's rebate claim, finding it unsustainable due to lack of sufficient material and inconsistency with the Department's case of duty evasion. The Court upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision to remand the case for further examination by the Assistant Commissioner. The Court directed the Union of India to recover any payments made to the First Respondent pending the case, and ordered the rebate application to be decided promptly within three months. The Court's ruling was made without any costs imposed. en-us Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 May 2012 09:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213013 The High Court quashed the revisional authority's decision allowing the First Respondent's rebate claim, finding it unsustainable due to lack of sufficient material and inconsistency with the Department's case of duty evasion. The Court upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' decision to remand the case for further examination by the Assistant Commissioner. The Court directed the Union of India to recover any payments made to the First Respondent pending the case, and ordered the rebate application to be decided promptly within three months. The Court's ruling was made without any costs imposed. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213013