<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 63 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213010</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax on input services used for export was denied because the claim was not shown to comply with the notification&#039;s prescribed time limit, counted from the relevant date. The Tribunal held that entitlement under the refund notification depended on strict satisfaction of its conditions, and the assessee failed to establish on record that the claim was filed within the stipulated period. The refund claim was therefore treated as time-barred and not maintainable, and the Revenue&#039;s objection succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 63 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213010</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax on input services used for export was denied because the claim was not shown to comply with the notification&#039;s prescribed time limit, counted from the relevant date. The Tribunal held that entitlement under the refund notification depended on strict satisfaction of its conditions, and the assessee failed to establish on record that the claim was filed within the stipulated period. The refund claim was therefore treated as time-barred and not maintainable, and the Revenue&#039;s objection succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=213010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>