<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 52 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212999</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition related to the claim of bad debt. The confirmation of foreign travel expenses was upheld as the assessee failed to prove the expenses were for business purposes. The decision was pronounced on March 23, 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 08:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 52 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212999</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition related to the claim of bad debt. The confirmation of foreign travel expenses was upheld as the assessee failed to prove the expenses were for business purposes. The decision was pronounced on March 23, 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>