<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 598 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212992</link>
    <description>The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the denial of Cenvat credit to the respondent due to improper availment based on invoices from Kashish Import Pvt. Ltd. The issue revolved around the physical transportation of goods from Kashish Products Impex Pvt. Ltd. to the respondent&#039;s factory. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, stating that the evidence submitted was valid and no contradictory evidence was presented. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 598 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212992</link>
      <description>The appeal was filed by the Revenue against the denial of Cenvat credit to the respondent due to improper availment based on invoices from Kashish Import Pvt. Ltd. The issue revolved around the physical transportation of goods from Kashish Products Impex Pvt. Ltd. to the respondent&#039;s factory. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, stating that the evidence submitted was valid and no contradictory evidence was presented. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>