<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 47 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212988</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the service tax demand against the appellant for organizing a conference was incorrect. It was determined that no service tax is chargeable when an entity provides services to itself, as in this case where the delegates attending the conference were not clients but participants contributing for mutual benefit. The order confirming the service tax demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 47 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212988</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the service tax demand against the appellant for organizing a conference was incorrect. It was determined that no service tax is chargeable when an entity provides services to itself, as in this case where the delegates attending the conference were not clients but participants contributing for mutual benefit. The order confirming the service tax demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>