<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 504 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212968</link>
    <description>Reimbursable expenses may be excluded from taxable value as Pure Agent amounts where third-party bills, separate invoicing, absence of mark-up, supporting particulars, and the liability of the importer/exporter are established. The Tribunal upheld exclusion for 15 identified heads because those conditions were found satisfied and the challenge did not dislodge the Commissioner&#039;s findings. For the remaining reimbursements, where supporting documents had been produced at different stages but documentary correlation was incomplete or not fully examined, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication with a reasonable opportunity to produce and correlate the material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 504 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212968</link>
      <description>Reimbursable expenses may be excluded from taxable value as Pure Agent amounts where third-party bills, separate invoicing, absence of mark-up, supporting particulars, and the liability of the importer/exporter are established. The Tribunal upheld exclusion for 15 identified heads because those conditions were found satisfied and the challenge did not dislodge the Commissioner&#039;s findings. For the remaining reimbursements, where supporting documents had been produced at different stages but documentary correlation was incomplete or not fully examined, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication with a reasonable opportunity to produce and correlate the material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>