<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 28 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212962</link>
    <description>The court directed the Appellate authority to review and decide on pending stay petitions and appeals within four weeks. Recovery proceedings based on Ext.P4 notices were stayed until the authority&#039;s decision. The petitioners were instructed to submit the judgment and writ petitions for compliance. The judgment prioritized resolving appeals and stay petitions promptly while halting recovery actions, aligning with concerns raised by the petitioners regarding tax authorities&#039; actions under the CBDT Circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=186365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 28 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212962</link>
      <description>The court directed the Appellate authority to review and decide on pending stay petitions and appeals within four weeks. Recovery proceedings based on Ext.P4 notices were stayed until the authority&#039;s decision. The petitioners were instructed to submit the judgment and writ petitions for compliance. The judgment prioritized resolving appeals and stay petitions promptly while halting recovery actions, aligning with concerns raised by the petitioners regarding tax authorities&#039; actions under the CBDT Circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=212962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>